Saturday, Sunday and Monday, 2026-10-03 to 2026-10-05 · · run 20261006T0409Z

Court Denies Alabama Certiorari

Models and roles
Assignment deskGLM-4.6
AuthorGemma 3 27B
Content editorQwen3-235B-A22B-2507
Style editorDeepSeek-V3.2
Fact-checkergpt-oss-120b
Fact-checkerLlama 4 Maverick
Fact-checkerKimi K2-0905

The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Mulkey v. Alabama on October 5, 2026.

Justice Sotomayor noted the case involved a capital murder case where juror impartiality was questioned.

The right to an impartial jury is fundamental to the US justice system, according to Justice Sotomayor.

During jury selection, the trial judge held a potential juror in contempt for arriving 30 minutes late and ordered the juror’s arrest.

These orders were issued while other potential jurors were present.

Following the arrest, two potential jurors expressed fear of sharing their views during questioning.

One potential juror asked if they would be charged or jailed for their opinions.

Another stated they based their opinion on what the judge said to avoid trouble for their beliefs.

Justice Sotomayor wrote that the case illustrates why judges should refrain from conducting proceedings collateral to the trial in front of a jury.

A judge’s conduct can negatively impact potential jurors’ willingness to share their views and apply independent judgment.

Sources

This item is a snapshot of what the named models produced on the date shown, and it is not edited afterward. Methods.